sunrise

sunrise
Sunrise over the Atlantic

Help stop the slaughter of dolphins right now!

Showing posts with label Soapbox. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soapbox. Show all posts

Sunday, July 22, 2012

Is this something we should worry about?

Killer disease in Cambodia stumps experts


A doctor checks a child at Kantha Bopha children's hospital in Phnom Penh. Medical experts are scrambling to respond to what the Cambodian health ministry and World Health Organization have labelled an "undiagnosed syndrome" that has claimed the lives of at least 56 boys and girls, mostly toddlers, since April
A doctor checks a child at Kantha
A woman pulls a child on a gurney at Kantha Bopha children's hospital in Phnom Penh. It's not bird flu or SARS, and nor does it appear to be contagious, but little more is known about a mysterious disease that has killed dozens of Cambodian children, some within 24 hours of being hospitalised
A woman pulls a child on a gurney
Children and their parents at Kantha Bopha children's hospital in Phnom Penh. Paediatrician Beat Richner, the founder of Kantha Bopha children's hospitals, which see around 85 percent of Cambodia's severely ill youngsters who make it to treatment, was the first to raise the alert over the mystery illness
Children and their parents at Kantha

It's not bird flu or SARS, and nor does it appear to be contagious, but little more is known about a mysterious disease that has killed dozens of Cambodian children, some within 24 hours of being hospitalised.
Medical experts are scrambling to respond to what the Cambodian health ministry and World Health Organization (WHO) have labelled an "undiagnosed syndrome" that has claimed the lives of at least 56 boys and girls, mostly toddlers, since April.
Officials said just one child was believed to have survived the illness and the high fatality rate has spread concern among Cambodians, 30 percent of whom live below the poverty line according to the World Bank.
The WHO has put neighbouring countries on alert about the killer disease, that starts with a high fever and is followed by respiratory and neurologic symptoms "with rapid deterioration of respiratory functions".
There have been no cases reported outside Cambodia so far.
"We are looking at detailed information from the hospital records and analysing each and every case. We hope to have a better picture in the coming days," said Ly Sovann, deputy director of Cambodia's Communicable Disease Control Department in a joint statement with the WHO on Friday.
Paediatrician Beat Richner, the founder of Kantha Bopha children's hospitals, which see around 85 percent of Cambodia's severely ill youngsters who make it to treatment, was the first to raise the alert over the illness.
The Swiss doctor, who told Cambodian health officials about the illness last month, gave a higher toll than the WHO, saying 64 children had died from the disease since mid-April, while two more had recovered.
The victims were aged seven and under with most being between two and three years old, Richner told AFP in an interview. The most recent death was on Saturday.
"All these children have encephalitis (inflammation of the brain) and in the later hours of their life they develop a severe pneumonia with a destruction of the alveoli in the lungs. That is the reason they die," he said.
The alveoli, or air sacs, are pockets in the lungs where the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide takes place.
"We think it's either a virus, an intoxication, or both," Richner said.
While it is impossible to rule out contagion at this early stage, Richner said he had yet to come across two cases in the same family, and no health workers appear to have fallen ill after caring for the patients.
The WHO has also said it has found no clusters, though most of the patients came from central and southern parts of Cambodia.
Like the WHO and the health ministry, Richner's staff are racing to find the cause of the disease, sending blood and tissue samples to the Institut Pasteur -- a renowned infectious disease research centre.
Early results from a selection of those samples show some of the children had been infected by a lethal strain of hand, foot and mouth disease, although Richner said more analysis was needed.
He said all the patients who died were treated in private clinics in their local areas before being brought to the Kantha Bopha hospitals in the capital and the northwestern province of Siem Reap.
"They all got injections or infusions by private carers before coming to us," he said. "Some died four hours after arriving."
From his own figures, Richer said the two patients that lived were treated only by Kantha Bopha staff, suggesting that botched medical treatment may be a factor.
The WHO said it was too soon to draw conclusions.
"We are looking at the possibility of this being something new, a collation of different diseases with similar clinical presentations but caused by a different pathogen," said doctor Nima Asgari, a public health specialist at the WHO office in Cambodia.
The UN health body and Cambodian officials have urged parents to bring their sick children to hospital if they see any signs of "unusual illness".
Joining the daily queues of hundreds of families seeking treatment at Kantha Bopha, In Sitha said she first heard about the mystery illness while her three-year-old son was in hospital with pneumonia last month.
"I heard it develops very fast," she said. "As a mother, I feel very scared and helpless about this. I just hope this unknown disease can be cured so that my son and other people's children can survive."
Richner urged parents to stay calm saying "there's no reason for hysteria," and pointed out that an ongoing dengue fever epidemic was a much larger worry.
In June alone, more than 5,000 children were hospitalised with haemorrhagic dengue fever, compared to just 34 cases of the unknown disease. "That's the big problem," Richner said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm just saying, it could be really dangerous.  I guess we will have to wait and see what happens with it.

Saturday, July 21, 2012

The Phoenix Suns Have Resigned my favorite player!

Goran Dragic is a free agent and made a visit to the valley of the sun recently. 
I can only hope we're picking him up, but information is hard to find on a definitive answer.
It looks like he's back, but I'll keep checking for something concrete.  Without Steve Nash, we're going to need all the help we can get!

Update: July 19th.
We got him!
I'm so pleased.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

PLEASE READ THIS POST!!!!!! - The Cove

Even if you don't read my movie reviews or don't always read my blog, PLEASE do not skip this post.  It is one of the most important posts I will ever put on my website.
It's about Japan's slaughtering of tens of THOUSANDS of helpless innocent dolphins each YEAR.
We must stop this useless and senseless "tradition" of Japan today!
Knowledge is power and I've also included a link for you to sign a petition above, to help call our world leaders into action to stop it.  Please join me to help the dolphins.


Released: 2009
Documentary
Director: Louie Psihoyos
Starring: Thousands of helpless bottle nose dolphins being murdered
Running Time: 92 minutes
Rated: PG-13


The breakdown:  This was an incredibly emotional documentary for me that really affected me.  I'm going to let the IMDB.com website sum up the movie:
"Using state-of-the-art equipment, a group of activists, led by renowned dolphin trainer Ric O'Barry, infiltrate a cove near Taijii, Japan to expose both a shocking instance of animal abuse and a serious threat to human health."

Well, this is certainly the most important film I have watched this year, and an incredibly powerful one.  I had heard about this film from the Oscars actually.  It won best documentary in 2010 and I'm all for the movie getting as much attention as it possibly can.

Ric O'Barry is man who used to train dolphins in the 1960's.  In fact, he captured and trained all the bottle nosed dolphins used for the television show "Flipper" and he now regrets it.  He says if he had known then what kind of industry he was starting he would never have participated.

What he's discovered is a little tiny cove on the coast of Japan in a town called Taijii (pronounced Tie-Gee) that has a big secret.  There every single year from September through March they drive as many dolphins as they can into this cove and murder them.  A few they single out to ship all over the world to be held captive in aquariums as long as they get their $150,000 per dolphin first, the rest, they slaughter in completely inhumane and cruel ways.  They separate the baby dolphins from the parents and kill babies first, but they don't do this right away.  They corral all dolphins during the day and leave them overnight to be killed in the morning.

The fisherman guard this area well when they have dolphins in the cove and try to get onlookers arrested on bogus charges.  They try to harass and intimidate anyone trying to take photographs or video of them or the area and they block just about everyone as best they can from getting anywhere near it.  This made it difficult for the filmmakers to get footage of the slaughter.  Ric O'Barry has been arrested so many times for dolphin releases and activism that anyone in that area knows him on sight and tries to get him away from the cove. 
So they did a covert operation where they took prop makers from Hollywood to make fake rocks to house cameras in and special equipment to be able to capture the footage they needed to show the world what horrors were happening in Japan.

They left their hotel in the middle of the night (while being followed by local police and fisherman) and were able to place cameras where they wanted to document the slaughter.

The numbers they reported are about 23,000 dolphins and porpoise are killed each year just in this one little town.  I don't know how many are shipped off into aquariums, but the ones in captivity are not happy.  Ric O'Barry said that his beloved Kathy that played Flipper, committed suicide in his arms from being so unhappy.  It sounds strange but he said they choose to breathe and can decide not to take another breath.  He said he was with her for a long time and just knew she wasn't happy and I believe him.  They say dolphins are highly intelligent and self aware, who is to say that they can't be happy or sad and choose to end their own suffering?

Whaling was made in illegal in all countries back in 1986 but the Japanese have still been killing all sorts of whales citing that they are only killing them for "research" but they kill hundreds each year and sell whale meat in their grocery stores.  Japan's government is trying to get the whaling ban overturned and has attempted this EVERY SINGLE YEAR SINCE 1986.  They try to buy other countries support with money.  Nations that have fallen on hard times or in general have always been impoverished and would respond well to money.  So Japan is not the only country calling for the whaling ban to be lifted.  They also cite that whales are to blame for depleting food sources like fish and that they are essentially doing "pest control" by killing whales and other fish eaters.  I was happy to see that most countries are not in agreement with the "facts" Japan is trying to push.  They showed a conference where representatives from all over the world come together and speak about issues like whaling and sea life.  It's unfortunately a conference for a world organization that has no teeth, no power, but it is an awareness and a start to solving problems I guess.  The presentation that Japan gave was one noting the "pest control" and that whale populations are fully recovered and that they should be hunted again legally.  Most countries said they completely disagreed and that Japan's "proof and presentation" was essentially morally and biologically wrong and irresponsible.  So you think with so much opposition, the Japanese would give up, but they don't.

It's so strange to me though, the reasons they have for these murders.  They (the fisherman and the government) say it's tradition, it's their culture, but when asked about it on the street, the average citizen of Japan doesn't know this kind of slaughter is happening and they don't want to eat dolphin meat.  In fact, the fisheries are selling the dolphin meat as "whale" meat so the consumer doesn't even realize it.  Ironically, dolphin meat is terrible for human consumption as it is packed with high toxic levels of mercury.  So they are essentially poisoning themselves to death.

The greatest impact mercury poisoning has is on children and unborn fetus'.  At the time of filming, the Japanese government was feeding dolphin meat to their school children and in Japanese schools, lunch is mandatory.  They must eat everything on their plates.  Due to two very brave Japanese councilmen who had children in school, they blew the whistle and the dolphin meat is no longer being served for lunch.

At the end of the film, you finally get to see all the secret footage taken in the cove.  It is brutal and powerfully disturbing.  It moved me to tears and this film will always be with me because of what I saw happen there.  The water, all of it in the cove, turns bright blood red as dolphin after dolphin is stabbed with a harpoon wherever the fisherman can get them, the head, the body, and then left to die a slow, horrible, and painful death.  From what the experts in the film said, the dolphins might very well know what is happening to all of them and are scared and confused.  It very much reminds me of the mass murdering of Jewish people in the holocaust.  How terrible it must feel to know you are about to be killed for no good reason, animal or human.

The Japanese government is very good at covering up what they don't want the world to see.  They explained that a company was dumping toxic waste into a local water source and that lots of people died from what that company was releasing into the environment.  The government covered it up for 12 years while people were dying of this so called "disease".  They actually called it a disease, like it was contagious, instead of just calling it what it really was - mercury poisoning.

What disgusts me is that all over Japan and Taijii is when you are there, they have all these whale museums, murals, sculptures and artwork everywhere.  It looks like they absolutely love and respect sea life when none of that is true.  I'm not sure if the Japanese government is alone to blame.  Do the citizens really know what's going on and just pretend not to to the outsiders who ask them?  Japan kills a ton of marine wildlife every year and ships fish all over the globe.  The seas are being over fished and the marine experts they spoke to said that by 2046, there's a good chance the ocean's food chain will collapse because of us.  7 out of 10 people get their proteins from seafood and fish and I'm very proud to say I'm not one of them.  I used to enjoy tuna, but with the amount of mercury being found in fish, especially bigger, older fish, like tuna, it's not safe for my own personal health.  A second reason not to eat it is due to the amount of other fish like shark and dolphins that are accidentally killed in fishing nets all the time.  Fisherman are raping the seas every single day whether they are catching sustainable fish or not.  I will not participate in this vicious cycle.  The only reason fishermen are catching fish or killing sharks and dolphins is because there is someone willing to pay to eat it.

Here's the main points of the film:
Japan's government is working hard to continue the horrible practice of dolphin slaughter and it's up to the people of the world to join together and stop them.

Dolphins should be free in the ocean to live and not in captivity....not at SeaWorld, not at aquariums, nowhere.  I have believed this for a long time and think that the only way SeaWorld and other aquariums should have any sea life is if they are rehabilitating it to go back in the wild, or if the animal can no longer live on it's own in the wild due to illness or injury.

I encourage everyone to see this movie.  Yes, it is very difficult to watch, but it is so important to know what's happening and learn how to help stop it.

There's a lot you can do to help!
Besides signing the petition with the link I have provided at the top of my blog, you can go to:
takepart.com/the cove
or you can watch the film
The Cove
which I have just told you about
and take action from there at the end of the credits.

Please do something....If you can't donate money, spread the word about the issues.
Stop eating seafood, write to your leaders, donate your time, and help anyway you can.

I can't do much, but at least today, I can help spread the word, and spread knowledge of what needs to be stopped.




Wednesday, May 16, 2012

No, I'm not on Facebook

As Facebook grows, millions say, 'no, thanks'


NEW YORK (AP) — Don't try to friend MaLi Arwood on Facebook. You won't find her there.
You won't find Thomas Chin, either. Or Kariann Goldschmitt. Or Jake Edelstein.
More than 900 million people worldwide check their Facebook accounts at least once a month, but millions more are Facebook holdouts.
They say they don't want Facebook. They insist they don't need Facebook. They say they're living life just fine without the long-forgotten acquaintances that the world's largest social network sometimes resurrects.
They are the resisters.
"I'm absolutely in touch with everyone in my life that I want to be in touch with," Arwood says. "I don't need to share triviality with someone that I might have known for six months 12 years ago."
Even without people like Arwood, Facebook is one of the biggest business success stories in history. The site had 1 million users by the end of 2004, the year Mark Zuckerberg started it in his Harvard dorm room. Two years later, it had 12 million. Facebook had 500 million by summer 2010 and 901 million as of March 31, according to the company.
That staggering rise in popularity is one reason why Facebook Inc.'s initial public offering is one of the most hotly anticipated in years. The company's shares are expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market on Friday under the ticker symbol "FB". Facebook is likely to have an estimated market valuation of some $100 billion, making it worth more than Kraft Foods, Ford or Disney.
Facebook still has plenty of room to grow, particularly in developing countries where people are only starting to get Internet access. As it is, about 80 percent of its users are outside U.S. and Canada.
But if Facebook is to live up to its pre-IPO hype and reward the investors who are clamoring for its stock this week, it needs to convince some of the resisters to join. Two out of every five American adults have not joined Facebook, according to a recent Associated Press-CNBC poll. Among those who are not on Facebook, a third cited a lack of interest or need.
If all those people continue to shun Facebook, the social network could become akin to a postal system that only delivers mail to houses on one side of the street. The system isn't as useful, and people aren't apt to spend as much time with it. That means fewer opportunities for Facebook to sell ads.
Lee Rainie, director of the Pew Internet & American Life Project, says that new communications channels — from the telephone to radio, TV and personal computers — often breed a cadre of holdouts in their early days.
"It's disorienting because people have different relationships with others depending on the media they use," Rainie says. "But we've been through this before. As each new communications media comes to prominence, there is a period of adoption."
Len Kleinrock, 77, says Facebook is fine for his grandchildren, but it's not for him.
"I do not want more distractions," he says. "As it is, I am deluged with email. My friends and colleagues have ready access to me and I don't really want another service that I would feel obliged to check into on a frequent basis."
Kleinrock says his resistance is generational, but discomfort with technology isn't a factor.
After all, Kleinrock is arguably the world's first Internet user. The University of California, Los Angeles professor was part of the team that invented the Internet. His lab was where researchers gathered in 1969 to send test data between two bulky computers —the beginnings of the Arpanet network, which morphed into the Internet we know today.
"I'm having a 'been-there, done-that' feeling," Kleinrock says. "There's not a need on my part for reaching out and finding new social groups to interact with. I have trouble keeping up with those I'm involved with now."
Thomas Chin, 35, who works at an advertising and media planning company in New York, says he may be missing out on what friends-of-friends-of-friends are doing, but he doesn't need Facebook to connect with family and closer acquaintances.
"If we're going to go out to do stuff, we organize it (outside) of Facebook," he says.
Some people don't join the social network because they don't have a computer or Internet access, are concerned about privacy, or generally dislike Facebook. Those without a college education are less likely to be on Facebook, as are those with lower incomes. Women who choose to skip Facebook are more likely than men to cite privacy issues, while seniors are more likely than those 50-64 years old to cite computer issues, according the AP-CNBC poll.
About three-quarters of seniors are not on Facebook. By contrast, more than half of those under 35 use it every day.
The poll of 1,004 adults nationwide was conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications May 3-7 and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.
Steve Jones, a professor who studies online culture and communications at the University of Illinois at Chicago, says many resisters consider Facebook to be too much of a chore.
"We've added social networking to our lives. We haven't added any hours to our days," Jones says. "The decision to be online on Facebook is simultaneously a decision not to be doing something else."
Jones says many people on Facebook try to overcome that by multitasking, but they end up splitting their attention and engaging with others online only superficially.
Arwood, 47, a restaurant manager in Chicago, says she was surprised when colleagues on an English-teaching program in rural Spain in 2010 opted to spend their breaks checking Facebook.
"I spent my time on break trying to learn more about the Spanish culture, really taking advantage of it," she says. "I went on walks with some of the students and asked them questions."
Kariann Goldschmitt, 32, a music professor at New College of Florida in Sarasota, Fla., was on Facebook not long after its founding in 2004, but she quit in 2010. In part, it was because of growing concerns about her privacy and Facebook's ongoing encouragement of people to share more about themselves with the company, with marketers and with the world.
She says she's been much more productive since leaving.
"I was a typical user, on it once or twice a day," she says. "After a certain point, I sort of resented how it felt like an obligation rather than fun."
Besides Facebook resisters and quitters, there are those who take a break. In some cases, people quit temporarily as they apply for new jobs, so that potential employers won't stumble on photos of their wild nights out drinking. Although Facebook doesn't make it easy to find, it offers options for both deleting and suspending accounts.
Goldschmitt says it takes effort to stay in touch with friends and relatives without Facebook. For instance, she has to make mental notes of when her friends are expecting babies, knowing that they have become so used to Facebook "that they don't engage with us anymore."
"I'm like, 'Hmmm, when is nine months?' I have to remember to contact them since they won't remember to tell me when the baby's born."
Neil Robinson, 54, a government lawyer in Washington, says that when his nephew's son was born, pictures went up on Facebook almost immediately. As a Facebook holdout, he had to wait for someone to email photos.
After years of resisting, Robinson plans to join next month, mostly because he doesn't want to lose touch with younger relatives who choose Facebook as their primary means of communication.
But for every Robinson, there is an Edelstein, who has no desire for Facebook and prefers email and postcards.
"I prefer to keep my communications personal and targeted," says Jake Edelstein, 41, a pharmaceutical consultant in New York. "You're getting a message that's written for you. Clearly someone took the time to sit down to do it."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only one who has chosen not to participate.

My personal reasons for not joining:
(in no particular order)
I don't need to know if my friends are currently eating a cheeseburger, watching a movie, or just loved the restaurant they went to.  If they want to tell me they can in a phone call or in person.

I worry about the amount of information given out about me on the internet that's out of my control already.  I don't need to tell possible burglars and rapists when I'm leaving my house or if I'm on vacation.  By the way, I live with a lot of people so the house is never vacant....ever.

I don't like Facebook in general, much like I don't like Walmart.
I'm fine with everyone else doing it; it doesn't affect me one way or the other, so have fun if you like it.


Saturday, May 12, 2012

I cannot be the only one who thinks this

I saw this promotional picture for Ricky Gervais' latest show on HBO called "Life's Too Short".  Personally, I don't think the show's too funny, but is Ricky getting hotter or is it just me?  I always thought he was very funny and highly intelligent, but just kinda' there looks wise.  Then he goes and loses 50 pounds and turns 50 and I say, whoa, he looks like some guy I might want to date...
hmmmmmm sexy.
So what do you think?
He looks good in this pic, no?

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Man Candles?!

So in the mail today I got a little advert from Yankee Candle.  Without Illuminations around anymore they are my go to for candles.
So, I'm looking at it and I see they have some new candles for a limited time only.....Man Candles?  What is that supposed to mean?
CatBan_SUM12_730x190_WNew_mancandlesIf you look closely, the titles of these new scents are things like Man Town, 2x4, and Riding Mower.

This must be the WORST idea Yankee has come up with for a long time.

I don't even want to know what Man Town smells like.

All I can think of are about 100 guys coming home from working in places like coal mines, rock quarries, and out in the backyard in 100 degree weather stinking to high heaven and in desperate need of a long shower.  That, I do not want to smell.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Happy Cinco De Mayo you say?

Don't get me started on Cinco De Mayo.

Things like why do we celebrate it here in the United States?

Mexico won it's independence from France so what does it have to do with us?
People just looking for another excuse to get super drunk and cause auto accidents.

If Mexico's so great then why don't all the Mexico lovers go back there and leave the United States?!

Gets me all fired up just talking about it.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Would you tour Chernobyl?

I sure as hell wouldn't but I noticed this movie title that struck me as bizarre.
It's called the Chernobyl Diaries and it's from the same stupid people that made a crap load of money off those stupid Paranormal Activity movies.
It's about some stupid young people who go to Europe and decide on the spur of the moment to do a tour of Chernobyl.
I thought this was impossible.  I had watched a nature program last year about the wild life that is living inside the quarantine zone of the nuclear disaster that happened in 1986 and I was wondering how those people got in to do the filming.
I realized that the animals were all suffering from high levels of radiation exposure and they had said a lot of the species had some mutations as expected.  But like I said, I was wondering how those people got on the property to do the special given that they were also being exposed to radiation that I wouldn't be willing to put myself through.

They clearly have gates and signs posted about trespassing as well as armed guards that keep most people out of the area.  Although, I have recently discovered that some people still live in an area dangerously close to the reactor that blew and they are probably taking several years off their life by refusing to relocate....I guess the government let them choose and they chose to stay there.

So, here's an article on the topic I found helpful and interesting.

Overall, it says, do not go there without real knowledge of nuclear fallout and protective gear or without a tour guide.  I say don't go there at all.  I don't think we understand this situation well enough to expose yourself to something that is completely unnecessary.

I wouldn't go for anything.
There is no author to the article, but I got it from a website called
worldnomads.com
------------------------------------------------------------------

Ukraine - Is It Safe To Travel To Chernobyl?

Sunday, 18 July 2010

For those around at the time and conscious of world events, the images from the 1986 nuclear disaster in the Ukrainian city of Chernobyl are just as memorable as the Challenger Space Disaster and 9/11.

The catastrophe was caused by an explosive meltdown due to an extreme power spike, and saw over 350,400 people evacuated from severely contaminated areas of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia.

Today, Chernobyl and it’s surrounds are a ghost-town – with only a few thousands souls brave enough to continue to live in the affected areas, which still suffer from extensive levels of radiation.

But it’s this very spookiness that has drawn some travellers to Ukraine to witness its breathtaking desolation.

Some readers might remember the photo-documentation of the area by Ukrainian photographer Elena Filatova. Her website, Kidd Of Speed, showed the eerie, apocalyptic landscape of post fall-out Chernobyl.


It’s not surprising that Elena’s photographs sparked interest in the region – but now that people want to go back to Chernobyl to see what has been left behind, and considering the dangers posed by the fallout, is it really worth the risk?

Is it safe?


The Ukrainian government has permitted entry into the surrounding areas of Chernobyl, but with strict conditions.

To enter the 30km exclusion zone, you will need a day pass to enter – which can be obtained from several tour operators that have been established.

Certain areas, such as the ‘machine cemetery’ of Rossokha village, are forbidden to enter under government restrictions. Obviously, areas marked as radioactive, or forbidden entry zones, are exactly that. You should stay well away from them – lest you wish to end up another Chernobyl statistic.

Basically, to go into the exclusion zone without either a) a tour operator or b) being a qualified nuclear fallout expert with your own equipment, is attempting suicide. The environment in relation to radiation levels in certain areas is extremely dynamic, and without proper measurement, you could be exposing yourself to deadly material.

Radiation is measured in Roentgens, and during a Chernobyl tour, the levels of exposure can range from 15 to 2-300 microroentgens p/h. A lethal dose of radiation is in the vicinity of 300-500 roentgens in an hour period. Outside of a tour, it’s impossible to gauge how much radiation you are being exposed to without professional equipment. Also, exposure to higher levels of radiation puts you at higher risk of having particles remain on your clothes. Sustained exposure to radiation is the greatest cause of contamination.

Another point to keep in mind, many of the abandoned buildings are covered in broken glass and debris, and the floor surfaces can be highly unstable. If you choose to travel inside the exclusion zone, make sure you wear rugged and protective covering, and keep your bare skin to a minimum.


(And given the bone chilling creepiness of some of the buildings, you might need to bring a second set of pants)

Saturday, April 14, 2012

A terribly sad story.

Rare Disease Mimics Child Abuse and Tears Family Apart


William "Dave" O'Shell, distraught over charges of child abuse that were being leveled against him, snapped on June 30, 2008, killing his wife, Tiffany O'Shell, in their Henderson, Colo., home before taking his own life.
Just a few weeks earlier, their green-eyed, 3-month-old daughter, Alyssa, had been placed in a foster home because x-rays revealed 11 broken bones and doctors assumed that she had been beaten.
But they were wrong.
On the same day as the murder-suicide, a doctor at Colorado Children's Hospital suspected something else and was later proved right: Alyssa had a rare genetic disorder that caused her bones to fracture -- one that authorities had confused for abuse.
Alyssa died of spinal muscular atrophy on Oct. 28, 2008, but the tragedy has rippled through a family and an aggressive social services system that is meant to protect children.
Now, four years later after all lawsuits have been unsuccessful, Alyssa's maternal grandparents are saying the tragedy could have been averted.
"We were looking for action. We could care less about the money," said Paul Cuin, Tiffany O'Shell's adoptive father. "We wanted someone to sit up and say, 'This is wrong and we need to change things.'"
Cuin said there were no avenues for the O'Shells, both respected police officers, to plead their innocence.
"If our kids had some sort of outlet or grievance process or gone to someone, we would have a whole different story today," he said. "The system has to change."
A judge gave Cuin, 59, and his wife, Jackie Cuin, 50, custody of Alyssa after the death of their daughter and son-in-law, despite the objections of social services, according to a story first published in the Denver Post.
The newspaper obtained medical, social services and police records in their investigation, as well as court documents on the Cuins' lawsuits.
"They were wonderful parents," said Paul Cuin, who is a supermarket manager. "We never had a single doubt in our minds [over whether] abuse was involved. We knew from the beginning, they loved that baby."
They nursed Alyssa until her death and are convinced that if doctors knew more about SMA, the disease might never again be confused with child abuse.
Spinal muscular atrophy, or SMA, is a genetic neuromuscular disease characterized by muscle atrophy and weakness. It is caused by a mutation in the gene on the long arm of chromosome 5, which makes a protein that is important in the cells of the spinal cord and lower brain stem.
It is not always a death sentence, but those with the most serious form, like Alyssa, can suffer respiratory failure.
The disease is the leading genetic cause of death in infants and toddlers, affecting as many as 10,000 to 25,000 children and adults in the United States, according to the SMA Foundation.
"It took seven months to diagnose my 12-year-old daughter, and my husband is a scientist and we live in New York City," said Loren Eng, president of the SMA Foundation. "So few doctors are aware of the disease and it causes a wide variety of symptoms. It's really an awareness problem."
Dr. Darryl De Vivo, a professor of neurology and pediatrics at Columbia University, said SMA can "masquerade to some degree" as child abuse, "at least to the uneducated eye."
"The nature of this disease is such that it allows the bone to be unduly susceptible to fractures in the normal handling of the infant," he said.
De Vivo added that with heightened awareness to child abuse, "people jump in and say guilty before being proven innocent."
The Colorado case began in on June 16, 2008, when Tiffany O'Shell noticed that Alyssa cried when she lifted her right leg. The baby was referred to Children's Hospital of Colorado, where x-rays revealed fractures, but no bruises or abrasions.
"We pleaded with the doctor at Children's Hospital and social service to look for something else other than child abuse," said Paul Cuin. "They should have waited and not jumped to conclusions."
Elizabeth Whitehead of Children's Hospital Colorado said the hospital would not comment "on alleged child abuse cases, past or present."
Child protective services took Alyssa immediately and placed her in a foster home. Her grandparents were ruled out as guardians because Jackie Cuin had spent time babysitting the child and was considered a suspect.

The O'Shells had one supervised visit with Alyssa, according to Paul Cuin. The baby turned her head away from her parents several times and authorities interpreted that as confirmation of abuse.
Dave O'Shell became a chief suspect when he admitted that he often held her by the legs upside down -- which he said made the baby smile, according to the Post.
Cuin said the signs of SMA were evident in Alyssa, "but no one saw it" until the baby's foster mother took her to the doctor because she was failing to thrive.
A pediatrician at Children's Hospital noticed the classic symptoms: the baby's thumb turned inward, a "bell-shaped" stomach and "frogs legs" that wouldn't straighten, according to Cuin. Alyssa's breathing was labored and she struggled to hold her head up.
Suspicious, the doctor called for genetic tests, but no one alerted Alyssa's parents, according to Cuin.
"If they had had a little bit of hope," Cuin said, "this all would have been different.
On July 9, the results confirmed SMA, and on July 11, a caseworker called the Cuins' lawyer. The O'Shells had been dead nearly two weeks.
By July 16 the Cuins went to court and a judge granted them custody.
The Cuins defend their son-in-law against abuse charges, but are still struggling to understand why he murdered their daughter.
"David was a very stable individual," said Cuin. "It shocked us. But I fully understand the pressures he was under."
Cuin said O'Shell had lost all hope, told by his lawyer that he would go to prison and lose not only his daughter, but his wife, his job and his military status. If arrested on felony abuse, he would have had to raise $50,000 bail.
Two days before the murder-suicide, O'Shell told his wife he was "going to shoot people" so police would have a reason to arrest him, according to the Denver Post. He became increasingly despondent.
One June 30, the couple was scheduled to meet with lawyers and a criminal investigator about the abuse charges. Jackie Cuin tried to call her daughter but got no answer.
She went to check on her at the house, but was too afraid to enter, calling her husband.
Paul Cuin found the bodies: Tiffany, who had been shot in the head twice, was covered in blood in bed. Dave's legs were sticking out the bedroom doorway.
"I haven't forgiven him," said Cuin. "And I don't know if I will ever be able to."
Cuin and his wife now live day-by-day, and their awareness campaign is what keeps them going.
"We don't want the kids' death to be in vain," he said. "We want something good to come of it."
"I don't have a problem at all with social services coming and taking a child and doing an investigation," said Cuin. "There is a need for this service. There are bad people out there and kids need to be protected."
"But the system did the opposite," he said. "It tore a family apart."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I usually don't post articles like this but I thought this one was very sad and important to raise awareness that a disease like this exists.
Very often I find myself forming an opinion about something I've heard or read and it sticks with me.  Although I'm open minded (and consider myself to be very tolerant and very open minded) I'm afraid I might've thought this was child abuse as well, but I'm no doctor and certainly not trained to see what would be needed to make an educated opinion.
I feel terrible for the family and sad that the system designed to protect, fails everyone again.
Perhaps the wife wanted to die as well, but couldn't pull the trigger.  Maybe her husband snapped completely and killed her without thought.  It just goes to prove what some people are capable of after they get pushed and pushed and pushed.  I'm sure the husband and wife could've been very in love and very in love with their baby, but when faced with losing absolutely everything I'm sure they might've felt there was nothing left to be done but die.
Terrible, terrible outcome for this situation, and too bad that someone from the medical facility didn't call the parents to let them know there was a chance they could prove it wasn't child abuse in time.

Friday, April 13, 2012

Stop the mistreatment of farm animals

ASPCA Lobby for Animals
Your Opinion Counts!
Nat'l Organic Standards Board Seeks Comments
Dear Animal Advocates,

When perusing labels and making choices at the grocery store, it’s common for consumers to equate “organic” with “humane”—but unfortunately, the two are not always synonymous.

The National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), a government advisory committee appointed by the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, will be meeting at the end of May 2012 to discuss proposed standards to increase animal welfare requirements for organic poultry operations. The ASPCA will attend the meeting to ask for humane standards of care for chickens, turkeys, ducks and geese—but we need NOSB to hear your voice, too!

NOSB’s proposed standards do not provide for adequate space or healthy air quality, do not prohibit break trimming, and fail to ban the force-feeding of ducks and geese associated with foie gras production. Tell NOSB that these birds deserve better!
What You Can Do
Please visit the ASPCA Advocacy Center online to learn more and to see how you can quickly and easily submit your comments to the NOSB.

Thank you for using your voice for these underserved animals.

www.aspca.org/organic

----------------------------------------------------------
Just wanted to repost this email I got from the Humane Society recently.
I signed up and sent my comments (which I shared below) so that I can stand up for the animals that cannot stand up for themselves.  I urge you to do the same.
All animals should be treated humanely whether they are bred for food or not.


To whom it may concern
(which should be all humans)
I am writing to comment on the NOSB Livestock Committee’s proposed “Guidance for Assessing Animal Welfare on Organic Poultry Operations.” Thank you for taking steps to ensure the welfare of chickens, turkeys, geese and ducks raised for organic food production. Please improve the guidelines so that organic poultry production is more humane.
1. All animals should have enough space to allow them to engage in natural movements and behaviors. Please increase minimum indoor and outdoor space allowances for chickens and turkeys.  All animals should be allowed space to live and be comfortable instead of confined their entire lives in a tiny cage.
2. The proposed guidance should prohibit the force-feeding of birds for the production of foie gras.  This is a completely cruel thing to do to animals for the sole purpose of feeding people.  I wouldn't want to be force fed, would anyone?
3. Beak trimming should be prohibited unless proper husbandry techniques have first been used to eliminate feather pecking and cannibalism. When performed, it should inflict the least amount of pain possible.
4. Poor air quality can affect the health and welfare of birds. NOSB’s proposed maximum ammonia level is equivalent to the conventional industry standard and does not provide adequately for welfare. Ammonia levels at organic poultry facilities should be less than 10 ppm, and corrective action must be taken if the level exceeds 15 ppm.
5. Producers should raise slow-growing poultry breeds to avoid the debilitating health problems associated with rapid weight gain.
Consumers expect animals raised for organic food to be treated humanely. PLEASE strengthen the care standards outlined in this document so that chickens, turkeys, geese and ducks raised for organic food do not suffer.
All animals deserve kind treatment and I wish I didn't have to write a letter to ask for basic human kindness for animals!!!
Please help the helpless!

Monday, April 9, 2012

For the People Who don't Believe in Climate Change

It's already been a very record-breaking hot year


WASHINGTON (AP) — It's been so warm in the United States this year, especially in March, that national records weren't just broken, they were deep-fried.
Temperatures in the lower 48 states were 8.6 degrees above normal for March and 6 degrees higher than average for the first three months of the year, according to calculations by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. That far exceeds the old records.
The magnitude of how unusual the year has been in the U.S. has alarmed some meteorologists who have warned about global warming. One climate scientist said it's the weather equivalent of a baseball player on steroids, with old records obliterated.
"Everybody has this uneasy feeling. This is weird. This is not good," said Jerry Meehl, a climate scientist who specializes in extreme weather at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. "It's a guilty pleasure. You're out enjoying this nice March weather, but you know it's not a good thing."
It's not just March.
"It's been ongoing for several months," said Jake Crouch, a climate scientist at NOAA's National Climatic Data Center in Ashville, N.C.
Meteorologists say an unusual confluence of several weather patterns, including La Nina, was the direct cause of the warm start to 2012. While individual events can't be blamed on global warming, Couch said this is like the extremes that are supposed to get more frequent because of manmade climate change from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil.
It's important to note that this unusual winter heat is mostly a North America phenomenon. Much of the rest of the Northern Hemisphere has been cold, said NOAA meteorologist Martin Hoerling.
The first quarter of 2012 broke the January-March record by 1.4 degrees. Usually records are broken by just one- or two-tenths of a degree. U.S. temperature records date to 1895.
The atypical heat goes back even further. The U.S. winter of 2010-2011 was slightly cooler than normal and one of the snowiest in recent years, but after that things started heating up. The summer of 2011 was the second warmest summer on record.
The winter that just ended, which in some places was called the year without winter, was the fourth warmest on record. Since last April, it's been the hottest 12-month stretch on record, Crouch said.
But the month where the warmth turned especially weird was March.
Normally, March averages 42.5 degrees across the country. This year, the average was 51.1, which is closer to the average for April. Only one other time — in January 2006 — was the country as a whole that much hotter than normal for an entire month.
The "icebox of America," International Falls, Minn., saw temperatures in the 70s for five days in March, and there were only three days of below zero temperatures all month.
In March, at least 7,775 weather stations across the nation broke daily high temperature records and another 7,517 broke records for night-time heat. Combined, that's more high temperature records broken in one month than ever before, Crouch said.
"When you look at what's happened in March this year, it's beyond unbelievable," said University of Victoria climate scientist Andrew Weaver.
NOAA climate scientist Gabriel Vecchi compared the increase in weather extremes to baseball players on steroids: You can't say an individual homer is because of steroids, but they are hit more often and the long-held records for home runs fall.
They seem to be falling far more often because of global warming, said NASA top climate scientist James Hansen. In a paper he submitted to the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and posted on a physics research archive, Hansen shows that heat extremes aren't just increasing but happening far more often than scientists thought.
What used to be a 1-in-400 hot temperature record is now a 1 in 10 occurrence, essentially 40 times more likely, said Hansen. The warmth in March is an ideal illustration of this, said Hansen, who also has become an activist in fighting fossil fuels.
Weaver, who reviewed the Hansen paper, called it "one of the most stunning examples of evidence of global warming."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Truly alarming and impossible to deny, weather hasn't been acting normal for these past few months.  It worries me to see what's coming for this summer and beyond.
Industrialized nations, but especially the United States, needs to research and implement alternative power sources like wind, water, and solar power if we're ever going to help the Earth survive what mankind has already negatively impacted.
The problem with the United States is that the government officials that are supposed to be serving the people, are serving themselves by lining their pockets with money from big oil companies that bribe them to continue to block badly needed research and development of these alternative fuel sources.
Fossil fuels and the search for them, only powers wars, and ultimately complete destruction of the only place we can live in the universe.
A pretty steep price to pay for all of us don't you think?

Friday, March 23, 2012

I don't think this is the answer....

Judge: Sea Lion Killings to Save Salmon Can Resume
Oregon state authorities can resume killing California sea lions that feast on endangered salmon bottled up at a dam on the Columbia River, but fewer than one-third as many as federal biologists previously had authorized, a judge ruled Thursday.
U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg in Washington, D.C., denied the Humane Society of the United States request to stop the killing at the Bonneville Dam while a lawsuit challenging the program goes forward. But he limited the killing to 30 animals a year instead of the 92 authorized by federal authorities, and ordered that none of them may be shot.
"The case will go forward, and we feel we have a very strong case in the end," Humane Society marine program leader Sharon Young said of their third attempt to permanently halt the killings since they started in 2008.
The floating traps are out and if any of the 92 California sea lions branded as regular salmon eaters are seen inside them, the gates will be sprung, and the animals killed by lethal injection, said Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife spokeswoman Jessica Sall. She said they have no plans to shoot any animals. California sea lions that hang around the dams eating salmon, and refuse to leave despite hazing by rubber bullets and firecrackers, go on a kill list.
null
AP
FILE - California Sea lion


Adult salmon and steelhead returning to spawn get bottled up at the fish ladders over Bonneville, located east of Portland, Ore. California sea lions, which are federally protected as marine mammals, but not as threatened or endangered species, swim about 145 miles upriver to the dam to feed on the fish in the spring.
The limits imposed by the judge should not pose a problem, Sall said. The department did not anticipate killing more than 30 animals in any one year. Over the past four years, only 41 have been trapped and killed or sent to a zoo or aquarium. The current authorization from NOAA Fisheries Service is good for four years.
The Humane Society lawsuit contends that the NOAA Fisheries Service erred when it decided that sea lions eating up to 4.2 percent of the fish passing over the dam amounted to a significant obstacle to the restoration of endangered salmon, when fishermen are allowed to take up to 17 percent. It adds that killing sea lions will have no effect on restoring salmon, which face a greater threat from fishermen and predation by walleye and bass introduced into the river for sport fishermen to catch.
The department, a co-defendant in the case, counters that while sea lions kill some protected salmon, fishermen are only allowed to kill hatchery-bred fish. The department says it is able to estimate how many wild fish die after being released, and to shut down the season if necessary.
Salmon returns to the Columbia Basin in Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Montana have declined steadily from harm caused by dams, logging, agriculture, and urban development since settlement of the region began in the 1840s. Only a small percentage of the fish are wild, with the great majority produced in hatcheries. There are 14 different types of wild salmon and steelhead in the Columbia Basin protected by the Endangered Species Act.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know, personally, if the Humane Society is saying that people are responsible for taking 17% of the fish, over the sea lions 4% then shouldn't the humans be the one to stop overfishing?

And why do they have to kill the sea lions????
Can't they just take all of them and either re-locate them or put them in a zoo or something a bit less fatal?

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Help to stop Ag-gag bills from being approved

Ag-Gag Legislation


Chickens
In late 2011, the organization Mercy for Animals released a video shot inside a North Carolina turkey factory farm owned by Butterball. The video shows acts of animal cruelty and neglect—in it, frightened turkeys are hit with what appear to be metal rods, violently kicked, thrown hard against the side of a truck and dragged across the floor. The video also shows birds suffering with bloody open wounds, broken bones and diseased eyes.


As a result of this critical video evidence, five Butterball employees have been charged with felony and misdemeanor animal cruelty. But if big agribusiness had its way, the person charged would have been the investigator who captured and reported the abuse.


In the last few years, the farm industry has been driving the introduction of "ag-gag" bills in state legislatures across the country. The purpose of these bills is to criminalize acts related to investigating the day-to-day activities of industrial farms. Such investigations have previously formed the basis of animal cruelty prosecutions and spurred reforms to protect the safety of our food supply.
"Ag-gag" or "whistleblower suppression" bills take many forms. What they all have in common is they threaten not only to cover up horrific animal abuse and food safety problems, but also other illegal or unethical behavior including environmental and labor violations. Animals deserve to be protected, and the public has a right to know how its food is produced.
It is important to let our state legislators know that we do not support the passage of ag-gag bills or any other legislation that would allow animal abuse to be covered up.

What activities do ag-gag bills criminalize?

Ag-gag bills may seek to criminalize the recording, possession or distribution of still images (photos), live images (video) and/or audio at or upon a farm, industrial agricultural operation or "animal facility." Bills in some states seek to bar potential investigators from gaining employment on farms.

Why are ag-gag bills being introduced?

As noted above, many successful animal welfare investigations have revealed severe abuses of animals and raised additional concerns about industrial farms, such as the potential contamination of eggs and meat. Such revelations are damaging to the animal agriculture industry and have led to product recalls, decisions by retailers to drop suppliers, legal prosecutions of employees and hard questions posed to the animal agribusiness industry.
It is worth noting that the use of exposés to reveal abuse has a long and storied history in America dating back to journalist Upton Sinclair's 1906 book The Jungle, which revealed atrocious conditions inside America's meatpacking plants and led directly to the passage of the federal Meat Inspection Act, the Pure Food and Drug Act, and the eventual formation of the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Learn about a few investigations that occurred more recently:
  • In 2008, a video shot by The Humane Society of the U.S. of workers at a California slaughter facility mishandling downer cows prompted a mad cow disease scare and the largest meat recall in U.S. history.

Why are ag-gag laws dangerous?

Ag-gag laws pose a threat to a wide spectrum of values and issues Americans care about. Because of this, many highly respected national organizations representing a range of public interests, including the ASPCA, have signed a statement in opposition to ag-gag bills. View the statement [DOC].
Social issues potentially impacted by ag-gag laws include, but are not limited to:
  • Animal Welfare. Ag-gag laws are a direct threat to animal welfare. We know that animals are often cruelly treated in factory farms and slaughterhouses. Documentation of this treatment not only helps educate the public about farm animal abuse, but also influences industry and government entities to make real changes for farm animals.
  • Food Safety. Ag-gag laws threaten our food supply: Various exposés of factory farms and slaughterhouses have revealed the extent to which our meat, eggs and milk are mishandled. Mishandling animal products, including mishandling farm animals while they are alive, invites health risks including salmonella, mad cow disease and other potentially fatal illnesses that may be transmitted to consumers.
  • Control over Food Choices. Ag-gag laws are a direct threat to marketplace transparency. At a time when Americans are increasingly invested in knowing more about where their food comes from and how it is made, these laws threaten our ability to control what we bring into our homes and the food we put in our bodies. All Americans should have the right to know the basic conditions under which their food is produced.
  • Workers' Rights. This legislation often seeks to criminalize the recording of sounds or images in animal facilities, no matter the content. Factory farms, slaughterhouses and meatpacking facilities are physically and emotionally difficult places to work. Farm investigations have the potential to expose serious worker abuse and other illegal or unethical conduct on the part of employees or supervisors.
  • Free Speech. Some ag-gag bills seek not just to criminalize recording, but even the possession and distribution of images recorded on animal facilities—and some seek to criminalize misrepresenting oneself on job applications (which, while possibly an act warranting termination of employment, should generally not be a crime). These provisions pose serious First Amendment threats.
  • Environmental Damage. In the United States, 99 percent of food animals are raised in factory farms, where large numbers of animals are housed together, generally in close confinement. Huge amounts of waste are generated, the improper storage and disposal of which threatens our soil and water. While state and federal laws require large farms to minimize their environmental damage, farms have been found flagrantly violating these requirements. Undercover investigations offer an effective way to expose such violations.
Ag-gag laws are also troublesome because they do not reflect the public's will. Polls consistently show that the majority of Americans favor humane treatment of farm animals. A 2012 poll conducted for ASPCA by Lake Research revealed that 94 percent of the general American public agrees that "from every step of their lives on a farm—from birth to slaughter—farm animals should be treated in a way that inflicts the least amount of pain and suffering possible." The same poll also revealed that 71 percent of American adults support undercover investigative efforts to expose farm animal abuse on industrial farms, and that 64 percent oppose making such investigations illegal.

Do any states already have these sorts of laws in place?

Three states (Kansas, North Dakota and Montana) already have "ag-gag"-type laws in place. Many others have related statues that are sometimes called "eco-terrorism" or "animal enterprise interference" laws.
It is important to remember that these laws, while crafted to appear reasonable, are largely designed to prevent the exposure of troubling practices at agricultural facilities. Click your home state on the U.S. map posted here to see if it currently has an ag-gag law on the books.

Which states have recently introduced ag-gag bills?

The following states introduced ag-gag bills in 2011 or 2012. None of the bills introduced in 2011 (marked with a *) passed that year, but all have either carried over into 2012 or been reintroduced in the states' 2012 sessions.
Florida* This bill has been dropped.
Indiana This bill is dead for the year.
Iowa* This bill was signed into law by Governor Branstad on March 2, 2012.
Minnesota* Take Action Now!
Utah Take Action Now!
Illinois This bill has been tabled.
Missouri
Nebraska
New York*
Tennessee

How can I help?

  • Be vigilant in your state—keep an eye on the local media for any news regarding the introduction and/or progress of ag-gag bills. Talk to your friends and neighbors about why ag-gag legislation is a bad idea.
  • Join the ASPCA's Advocacy Brigade, a group of more than 2 million advocates who use their voices for animals! As a member of the Advocacy Brigade, you'll be alerted by email when we need your help with animal-related legislation pending in your state and in Congress. Taking action is easy and very personally rewarding. Join the Advocacy Brigade now.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got an email from the ASPCA and had to pass it along.

Friday, March 16, 2012

Again, Animals dying for no good reason...

I saw this on the news the other morning and it sickened me. I hate Fox News and anything to do with them, but this story was worth watching. With so many other viable options for the Native American tribes, why is the government allowing this?

Our government is so self serving and broken already I have no hope of the American government ever actually helping and serving the American people again.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/us-15749625/permit-to-kill-an-american-symbol-28621180.html

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

It took a third horse to die for this show to be cancelled

HBO cancels horse racing series 'Luck'

In this undated image released by HBO, Nick Nolte appears in a scene from the HBO original series "Luck." HBO cancelled horse racing series "Luck" on Wednesday, a day after a third horse died during the production of the series that starred Dustin Hoffman and Nick Nolte. (AP Photo/HBO, Gusmano Cesaretti )
In this image released by HBO, horses race in a scene from the HBO original series "Luck." HBO says a horse used for the racetrack drama "Luck," was euthanized after suffering an injury. The animal was being led to a Los Angeles-area racetrack stable when it reared and fell back Tuesday morning, suffering a head injury, according to HBO. The horse was euthanized at the Santa Anita Park racetrack in Arcadia, where "Luck" is filming its second season. It's the third horse death to occur during production of the series starring Dustin Hoffman and Nick Nolte. (AP Photo/HBO, Gusmano Cesaretti)

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The horseracing series "Luck" was canceled by HBO after a third thoroughbred died during production of the drama starring Dustin Hoffman and Nick Nolte, the channel said Wednesday.
"Luck," about the seedier side of racing, will air the final two episodes of its first season now in progress, HBO said. But the series won't return for the second season that began production last month, it said.
"While we maintained the highest safety standards possible, accidents unfortunately happen and it is impossible to guarantee they won't in the future," the channel said. "Accordingly, we have reached this difficult decision."
The move was made with David Milch, the show's creator, and Michael Mann, his fellow executive producer on the drama that brought film actor Hoffman to series TV. It was a high-profile project for the premium channel that stakes its reputation on such fare.
HBO said it was "immensely proud" of the series and those involved in it, and the producers said in a joint statement that they "loved this series, loved the cast, crew and writers."
Retired jockey Gary Stevens, who co-stars on "Luck" and was in the racehorse movie "Seabiscuit," tweeted his support to the HBO series: "So bummed. Peace out to all my family in (hash)luck."
The American Humane Association, which oversees animal welfare on Hollywood productions, said that in light of the three deaths "this is arguably the best decision HBO could have made."
The group said it will work with HBO to ensure that horses used on "Luck" are "retired properly."
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which had been sharply critical of the production, welcomed the cancellation and offered advice to HBO and the producers if they decide to resume it.
"PETA will be calling on them, as we have done from the start, to use stock racing footage instead of endangering horses for entertainment purposes," the group said in a statement.
On Tuesday, a horse was injured and euthanized at Santa Anita Park racetrack, and HBO agreed to suspend filming with the animals after the American Humane Association issued an immediate demand "that all production involving horses shut down" pending an investigation.
The animal was being led to a stable by a groom when it reared and fell back, suffering a head injury, according to HBO. The horse was euthanized at the track in suburban Arcadia.
During season-one filming in 2010 and 2011, two horses were hurt during racing scenes and euthanized. HBO defended its treatment of the animals, saying it's worked with the humane association and racing industry experts to implement safety protocols that exceed film and TV industry standards.
The humane association had called for a production halt at Santa Anita after the second horse's death. Racing resumed after new protocols were put in place and proved effective, Karen Rosa, the AHA unit's senior vice president, said in February.
On Tuesday, Dr. Gary Beck, a California Horse Racing Board veterinarian, said he had just examined the horse as part of routine health and safety procedures before it was to race later in the day. The horse passed the inspection, the AHA said.
When the horse was injured, an attending veterinarian determined that euthanasia was appropriate, he said.
Dr. Rick Arthur, medical director of the state racing board, said such injuries occur in stable areas every year and are more common than thought. A necropsy will be conducted, he said, which is routine with all fatalities at racing board enclosures.
The necropsy and toxicology testing will be done despite the show's cancellation, the board said.
The first two horse deaths drew criticism from PETA, which said that safety guidelines used in filming failed to prevent the deaths "so clearly they were inadequate."
Kathy Guillermo, a PETA vice president, said at the time the group didn't consider the matter closed.
"Racing itself is dangerous enough. This is a fictional representation of something and horses are still dying, and that to me is outrageous," she said.
On Tuesday, Guillermo said PETA sent complaints about "Luck" to Arcadia police and an animal humane society in nearby Pasadena.
___
Associated Press Sports Writer Beth Harris contributed to this report.
___Online: http://www.hbo.com
http://www.peta.org http://www.americanhumane.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I complained about a week or two ago about this show's obvious neglect to keep their horse actors safe.  After two separate horse accidents where the horses were so badly injured they had to be put down, I was livid, and so were a lot of others.  They should've cancelled productions then, but I see it took a third innocent creature to die before they finally ended this brutal torture for horses, calling it entertainment.  I'm so glad no more animals will die for no good reason (at least on this show.)
A small victory in an on-going battle for sure.